雅思高分例文之：教育以及男女性别结合话题,雅学粉思微信公众号文章

雅学粉思

墨尔本首选雅思学府

高分例文解析：

特别提醒

这道雅思写作题涉及男女性别及大学教育两大话题。大学教育，是雅思中的传统热门话题之一，如今依然是雅思考试中的大热门；男女性别问题，则是近年来雅思考试中新出现的话题。很多考生感觉对男女性别这个话题有点“无话可说”，因此请特别留意范文中出现的各种论据。

写作点拨

这道雅思写作题要求考生就“大学是否应该确保每个科目的那女学生数目一致”发表自己的看法，属于“观点”类的雅思写作题。范文的写法比较“冒险”，可以给大家提供一种写作的不同思路。文章的第一段引入话题，却没有直接给出观点。第二、三、四、五段一次给出了反对男女生数目一致的四个理由，结尾段也没有再次重申观点。值得注意的是，写作水平有限的考生应该慎重选择这种方法。

雅学写作组组长Jack

雅学资深外教考官

红色标识陌生词

蓝色标识连接词

题目

大学是否应该确保每个科目的男女学生数目一致？

Universities should accept equal numbers ofmale and female students in every subject. Do you agree or disagree?

Since the feminist movement, females have been enjoyed increasingly equal opportunities as males do. They account for nearly half of college student population. Some people thus demand complete equality in all subjects in terms of student number. I am, however, strongly against this proposal（提议，建议n.）.

To begin with, the enrolment of men or women in each major should be dependent upon their respective（分别的，各自的adj.） academic performances and overall abilities, rather than some unrealistic percentage quota. Girls usually don’t do well in science and thus have little chance of competing against boys in the math department. Similarly, it is hard to find boys studying education, for many of them just don’t have the verbal skills or patience to become qualified teachers. Given the differences in their inherent(与生俱来的adj.) abilities, it is right to expect boys and girls to have separate academic pursuit.

Besides, the natural interests of both sexes should be taken into consideration when we approach this issue. By compelling some girls to study engineering merely to increase the female percentage, universities are forcing them to work against their natural inclination(倾斜，倾向n.) while denying other boys the chance of pursuing their real interests. In general, it is as hard, for example, to persuade male students to learn embroidery(刺绣n.) as it is to coax a girl to study anatomy(解剖学n). Therefore, students should be given the freedom as to what subjects they would like to learn.

Education being a preparation for their future careers, universities should mark the fact that certain jobs are gender-specific. Taking most manual work for example, it is physically unrealistic for a woman to be a construction worker, a plumber or a firefighter. At the same time, men can hardly succeed as nurses or kindergarten teachers. Understandably, gender differences shall be taken into consideration while students are still in college.

It's neither realistic nor necessary to recruit(恢复v.) the same number of male and female students. It is not an issue of equality but a matter of choice. Given the difference in abilities and preferences, students shall be given the right to choose for themselves rather than be subject to certain arbitrary(任意的adj.) quotas stipulating（规定v.） the number of students for each sex.